| ??? 03/14/05 18:43 Read: times |
#89655 - sorry for the informal language Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dear members,
I am sorry for the informal language, I used in my posts. regards, Neil. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89C66x and 89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hw IIC vs bitbang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can u illustrate/elaborate wth some code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rate does not matter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not true ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Total Agreement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about XRAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XRAM and mnufacturers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XRAM, more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW-I2C mostly sufficient ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| similar CPU load?? pray explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "...significant advantage..." | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how do you do soft IIC with 1% load | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1% = | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Peters 1% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very high data rates?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consider the whole program ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its really very high. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can microresistance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forum rules - no SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the skinny | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry for the informal language | 01/01/70 00:00 |