| ??? 03/14/05 19:03 Read: times |
#89657 - but Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ian Bell said:
That's OK for simple systems but for anything complex it soon gets out of hand. Sure, but should you be running it on an 8052 8 bit processor ? Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Inserting C Code in between Assembly Lan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stop It | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You Michael Karas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Round Robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rounb Robin + Time Sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| round robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How Long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK as far as it goes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| However | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but why make it harder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never Mention RTOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| out of hand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never mentioned multitasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| every rule has exceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 Banking versus External Components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time Slicing & Apology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why RTX51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice quote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'easier' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kludge | 01/01/70 00:00 |