??? 03/15/05 13:06 Read: times |
#89710 - every rule has exceptions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would disagree. I'd say that if you use code banking you may have chosen the wrong processor. For that matter, if you do constant 32-bit math or floating point you may have used the wrong processor. If we use hard and fast rules I'd say we could judge the '51 to be the wrong processor in most cases.
Every rule has exceptions, I have no doubt that a case could be found where codebanking a '51 would be the right approach. HOWEVER, progress has removed the "reason" for codebanking (no other processor can match the price point), it has largely disappeared with the event of the $5 ARM. Other "rules" that progress has created where I am sure exceptions can be found, although I will still preach them as "hard" rules: With ISP, do not waste time building a programmer. The 8255 is an antiquity, better solutions exist. The RC reset is insufficient. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Inserting C Code in between Assembly Lan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stop It | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You Michael Karas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Round Robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rounb Robin + Time Sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
round robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How Long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK as far as it goes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
However | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but why make it harder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never Mention RTOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
out of hand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never mentioned multitasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
every rule has exceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 Banking versus External Components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
agreed, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time Slicing & Apology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why RTX51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice quote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'easier' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kludge | 01/01/70 00:00 |