??? 03/14/05 19:31 Read: times |
#89667 - nope Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So are you saying you cannot do anything complex on an 8bit 64K system?
nope, I am saying that however complex what you are doing within 64k and 8 bits it will NOT get easier by messing it up with a URTOS. On the contrary, the more complex, the more control you need. Again: a subroutine is NOT as "task" in the true meaning of multitasking, thus when you run ONE task on a controller why mess it up with a process intended for multitasking?. If, however, you are making something that in the correct sense of the word is multitasking (two separate non-interactive programs) then, of course, an OS is (almost) mandatory. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Inserting C Code in between Assembly Lan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stop It | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You Michael Karas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Round Robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rounb Robin + Time Sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
round robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How Long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK as far as it goes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
However | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but why make it harder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never Mention RTOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
out of hand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never mentioned multitasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
every rule has exceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 Banking versus External Components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
agreed, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time Slicing & Apology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why RTX51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice quote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'easier' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kludge | 01/01/70 00:00 |