??? 03/25/05 19:02 Read: times |
#90423 - Calculations in C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raghunathan said:
Apart from what the other two members have replied, I would recommend the use of C if your code has plenty of calculations to do. I think this is dangerous because C masks the underlying register manipulations and type sizes so it is very easy to write slow inefficient calculation code in C. To me this is one of the areas where assembly really scores. Ian |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 in C or assembly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Always C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mostly 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No magic wand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Assembler when? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared data problem?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared Data Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge, not language. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Traps for the unwary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Preaching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ditto | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
red rag.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bend over then...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hauling assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil Allows this to be disabled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Know your tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It means 8 bit may be 16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More knowledge! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So which... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calculations in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ibid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not always.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
YMMV | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hitting the Wall | 01/01/70 00:00 |