??? 03/26/05 00:38 Read: times |
#90433 - ibid Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yueng Chun Chung said:
In what situation, will you think writing 8051 program in assembly will be better than in C? Ian Bell said:
... it is very easy to write slow inefficient calculation code in C. Which all goes to show how pointless it is to ask "assembly will be better (sic) than in C?" without specifying what you mean by "better" http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=90427 If you mean "easiest to write" then 'C' scores; if you mean "certainty of the generated code" then assembler scores. It is a meaningless question! |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 in C or assembly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Always C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mostly 'C' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No magic wand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Assembler when? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared data problem?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared Data Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shared Data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge, not language. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Promotion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Traps for the unwary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Preaching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ditto | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
red rag.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bend over then...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hauling assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil Allows this to be disabled | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Know your tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It means 8 bit may be 16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More knowledge! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So which... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Calculations in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ibid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not always.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Better?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
YMMV | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hitting the Wall | 01/01/70 00:00 |