| ??? 04/22/05 17:33 Read: times |
#92189 - Hard work? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stephan Burns said:
by not useing FAT the end user would have a harded time breaking apart the data on the ... You have two choices: 1. Make life easy for the 8051, and let the PC do the hard work of "breaking apart" the data; 2. Make the 8051 do the hard work of handling FAT, and make life easy for the PC. Probably the "hard work" in terms of writing the code in each case is comparable. In general, I prefer to keep the embedded part as simple as possible - so I think I'd go for a simple dump format, and write a PC app to access this as required. Especially as it sounds like PC access to the the flash card is only required in "excetional" circumstances. My 2p, anyhow. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple Filesystems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here is an idea... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thought about an EEPROM but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if only add data and read it all at once | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How big? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FAT might be overkill... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another reason not to use FAT. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I found this too. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are you sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| few thoughts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SD cards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I got three | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if what you are saying is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hard work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you decide on FAT support.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recent Article | 01/01/70 00:00 |