??? 06/17/05 05:00 Read: times |
#95129 - Select a device with the i/o you need Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Best to select a device that has all the i/o you need on chip rather than expanding it via the bus. Alternately, use I2C, SPI or some other slightly slower means of getting your i/o. Keeping all your high speed signals on-chip makes for an easier design- especially if you have to comply with EMC regs. Just the mere mention of 8255 is like swearing around here! Mind you, it is available as a military spec device from multiple vendors. I remember the old 8279, 8251A, 8255, 8253 ...... such sweet memories! Motorola fans are also finding it hard to get the venerable old 6821 also! |
Topic | Author | Date |
high speed microcontrller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Fast 8255 :-O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Working with high speed micros | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Select a device with the i/o you need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Funny | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sweary mary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Towing an Ox-cart with your Porsche?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternatively... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cheaper? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cheaper! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The first question !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
See for yourself. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why on earth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why on earth not?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the likelyhood is very small | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now you lose me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Here's why ... and maybe why not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Free IP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lotsa misses, few hits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: Free IP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
voltage ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
instead of moaning, use lattice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nobody's moaning ...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |