| ??? 05/31/06 12:38 Read: times |
#117357 - algorithm! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Forget about '51 and assembly language first.
Try to solve this problem in any language of your choice. The, come back with the result and we will guide you how to do it in '51 asm. The last step, you+we might try to optimise it. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Another standard problm in Assembly Lang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| many ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lookup table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hummmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| algorithm! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forget the lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no language dependency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| abstraction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Direct Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you take it at Grossmont? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong mark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just wonder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No not homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse bit numbering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse bit numbering: mirror | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's logical... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unconventional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, now I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Radix notation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why "Standard"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| give it in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally Some Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Much nicer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OH boy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No I havent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| edited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Prob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try & ask | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Many Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Q&A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Man! That just made my day! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Revised Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi abhishek!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 |