??? 06/02/06 08:49 Modified: 06/02/06 09:57 Read: times |
#117584 - Many Questions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Also it is a good idea to preserve the register area (at least 0-7 for register bank 0) for future use. Did not know that. But I definitely have a problem with how I store previous inputs i.e. MOV A,P2 CPL A MOV @R0,A where R0 counts from 8 to 1. Resulting in storing data in locations 1 to 8. This logic will work only if I use locations 1 to 8, and I dont like that. Could you suggest a different approach? Also, address 8 is the first byte which would be Could you please elaborate on that? A hardware problem: you write your output value into P3 where you read from your input value, that would collide. Yes that was a mistake. Actually Port3 is input and Port 2 is output. I Modified the code with changes highlighted, like you proposed. You also need some strobe to let the PC know the output value is written. I have written a Parllel port monitor that keeps polling the Parllel port and responds if certian predefined numbers are writen to it. I dont see why a strobe is required. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Another standard problm in Assembly Lang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
many ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
lookup table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hummmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
algorithm! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
forget the lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no language dependency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
abstraction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Direct Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you take it at Grossmont? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong mark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just wonder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No not homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bit 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reverse bit numbering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reverse bit numbering: mirror | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's logical... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unconventional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, now I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radix notation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why "Standard"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
give it in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finally Some Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Much nicer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OH boy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No I havent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
edited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Prob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
try & ask | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Q&A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Man! That just made my day! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Revised Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi abhishek!!!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |