??? 06/01/06 12:16 Read: times |
#117481 - Yes, now I know Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Unfortunately, for a "self-teacher" like me, conventions are one of those things that are not learnt before making mistakes. Thanks a lot for pointing it out anyway.
So, if I have lernt correctly a decimal number 8 is conventionally written as 0000100 and bit 2 happens to be HIGH, that is only if you are counting from 0. Am I right? Could you please corret me if I am wrong? |
Topic | Author | Date |
Another standard problm in Assembly Lang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
many ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
lookup table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hummmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
algorithm! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
forget the lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no language dependency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
abstraction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Direct Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
did you take it at Grossmont? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong mark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just wonder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No not homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bit 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reverse bit numbering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reverse bit numbering: mirror | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's logical... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unconventional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, now I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radix notation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why "Standard"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
give it in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finally Some Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Much nicer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OH boy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No I havent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
edited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Prob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
try & ask | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Q&A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Man! That just made my day! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Revised Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi abhishek!!!![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |