Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/01/06 12:45
Read: times


 
#117487 - Radix notation
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Abhishek Bk said:
So, if I have lernt correctly a decimal number 8 is conventionally written as 0000100

No.

This is basic school maths - radix notation, and place position:
the left-most digit is the most-significant, and the right-most is the least-significant.

When you write the number 123 in decimal (base 10), the '1' is "hundreds", the '2' is "tens" and the '3' is units.
Mathematically, that's 1x102 + 2x101 + 3x100

so 8 decimal is 1000 in binary (base 2):
1x23 + 0x22 + 0x21 + 0x20

You should be able to spot from this why it is so common to call the right-most (least-significant) bit "Bit 0"...

See http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=94478
and http://mathforum.org/library/d...54311.html




List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Another standard problm in Assembly Lang            01/01/70 00:00      
   many ways            01/01/70 00:00      
      lookup table?            01/01/70 00:00      
         yup            01/01/70 00:00      
            hummmm            01/01/70 00:00      
   algorithm!            01/01/70 00:00      
   OK            01/01/70 00:00      
      forget the lookup table            01/01/70 00:00      
         no language dependency            01/01/70 00:00      
            abstraction            01/01/70 00:00      
            Direct Test            01/01/70 00:00      
               did you take it at Grossmont?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Wrong mark            01/01/70 00:00      
   just wonder            01/01/70 00:00      
      homework            01/01/70 00:00      
         No not homework            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bit 3?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Depends            01/01/70 00:00      
               reverse bit numbering            01/01/70 00:00      
                  reverse bit numbering: mirror            01/01/70 00:00      
               It's logical...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thks            01/01/70 00:00      
               Unconventional            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, now I know            01/01/70 00:00      
                     oops            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Radix notation            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why "Standard"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      give it in C            01/01/70 00:00      
         Finally Some Code            01/01/70 00:00      
            formatted            01/01/70 00:00      
               Much nicer            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OH boy            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No I havent            01/01/70 00:00      
               edited            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No Prob            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  try & ask            01/01/70 00:00      
                     OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Many Questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Q&A            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Man! That just made my day!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Revised Code            01/01/70 00:00      
   hi abhishek!!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List