| ??? 06/01/06 11:56 Read: times |
#117475 - Unconventional Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Abhishek Bk said:
I am counting bits from LEFT TO RIGHT. You do realise that this is an unconventional way to do it? Therefore, you need to be sure to explain it whenever you mention bit numbers - do not assume that people will just know, or guess correctly! Also, you need to state whether you are numbering your bits from zero or one. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Another standard problm in Assembly Lang | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| many ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lookup table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hummmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| algorithm! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forget the lookup table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no language dependency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| abstraction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Direct Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did you take it at Grossmont? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong mark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just wonder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No not homework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse bit numbering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse bit numbering: mirror | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's logical... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unconventional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, now I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Radix notation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why "Standard"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| give it in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally Some Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Much nicer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OH boy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No I havent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| edited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Prob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| try & ask | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Many Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Q&A | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Man! That just made my day! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Revised Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi abhishek!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 |