??? 07/14/06 12:27 Read: times |
#120255 - I, too, can visualize some exotic conditions where Responding to: ???'s previous message |
in case this does get out of sequence, the numbers (which do not copy over) refer to http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=120246
As said above, some of the internal WD's are a crap. Jan, what you state is somewhat valid, but what you seem to miss is that 99.9% of the incidents that a WD should catch in fact ARE caught by traditional internal watchdogs. I, too, can visualize some exotic conditions where a traditional WD may not catch it, but, outside pacemakers and such, the traditional WD serves very well. 1) is not worth it for the cost vs numbers of catches (I imagine zero). 2) I know of no decent internal dog that does not 5) Nice, but why? if you get a WD reset you ARE in doo-doo. Btw most decent dogs do have this. 6) would defeat the purpose of consequtive writes, if the writes do not have to be consequtive, the chance of runaway code keeping the puppy alive is greatly increased. Erik |