| speed of microcontroller | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| crystal | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Incorrect! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Impossible to say! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| confusion | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan you need to add | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| scroll down | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the enlightenment that it "was explained there tha | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I may move it... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Other things | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Anything can happen | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's why we have Datasheets! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| switching times | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the other way round | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You've missed the point entirely! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Example | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| show and tell | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| where the datasheet belong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Overclocking | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How maximum speed is set | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you forgot | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the overclockers... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Vdd and leakage | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Lynn, please.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and Lynn please ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Are the average readers... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| i do not know the 'average' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Job security | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Off-datasheet operation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| view of an insider to the insides... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| careful now, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| apples and oranges | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, your example was 25 ppm ... ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OT: It feels like home... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well ... this topic is totally exhausted ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| as the song says "let me entertain you" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That doesn't change anything. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| BULLSHIT | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| so what? You\'ve got lots of bandwidth. Use it! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Once again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Richard, do you have an electric drill? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I read that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 3 - three - wrongs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If you believe this, then read the datasheet again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| clarification | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OT: for all the 8255 lovers and haters... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's not about the 8255, Jan | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| where thr .... did you get that from? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Please clarify ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| if that is what you want to call it, then yes. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, that\'s a horse of a different color | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what about "roughconvert" do you not understand | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OK ... so that's 1250 bytes/ms ,,, or 12.5 Mbps ? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I have no intention | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It won't benefit me ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| nope, for that I am paid | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OOOH! You're right ... I misread your post | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes, stick an \'always\' in | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Are you distorting or just misinformed? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| neither | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| now let me get this straight ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| This would be so darn easy to describe if I were n | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| More clarification, please, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| At the risk of entering a flame war... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, I suspect it is ... but he didn't say that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| gave you all you need, if you want to argue \'possi | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You're wandering off track ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| then how come you keep asking | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Because you, Erik, have overstated your case | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the danger of 'it' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not quite ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Richard, I would never accuse you of such a | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Artist vs. engineer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| why, were it not for you, then ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How do I... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Thre has been no other reason to bring this partic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| depends on the circumstances | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan, consider the details, please | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| bit bang for lack of other term | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan, that may be, but I don\'t think so ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| on interfacing both slow and fast on external bus | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Your conclusion doesn't follow, Jan | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I did not discuss the appropriateness of any... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| again ignoring increased interrupt latency | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What latency is that, Erik? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I already did | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not exactly ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not me, necessarily | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just how would that occur? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| finally you got it. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Once again, Erik, you\'ve missed the point | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| once more ignoring interrupt latency | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| double post again ... looks like the server\'s slow | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm lost long ago... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan, it\'s not my \"red herring\" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not so wide range of applications | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What do you mean? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this discussion or engineering? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Oh, this annyoing beating arround the bush! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry Erik! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Optimal? Well, maybe occasionally ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not use antiques is interfering with progress??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, the learner's progress | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Is that not obvious? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| nope ... not that simple | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| in the post you are responding to!!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Erik, You have no argument ... just an opinion | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| wrong once more | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Erik, YOU said it affects nothing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this is NOT about \'me\' or \'mine\' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| there you go again ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with any specific | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| We definitely disagree on this ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| if you can not accept this being general, then | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It has to be personal and about YOU, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I thought so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Now you've proven my point, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| back to technical ONLY | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So, what's the problem? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what good would that do? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Can't you support your dubious assertions? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| no ';cases' please | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Without specifics, there's no proof | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I will not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| All you've done so far, Erik, is huff and puff ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I have given you 'details' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Maybe, but your \"details\" don\'t support your claim | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan, there are always tradeoffs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| forgetting the \"methods of yore\" and instead discu | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| he can | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There's a semantic problem ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| already answered | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Get over it, Erik ... I don't want your "secrets" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| once more ignoring interrupt latency bugs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You keep referring to interrupts ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I even made that exception | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's probably quite true | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why "non-specific/vague question" karma point?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You don't get more vague than... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Come on... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| question vs answer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| we still only guess | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
