I've been an engineer for 40+ years and have never made a dime from stealing someone else's technology. I'm certainly not interested in how your product is built or designed.
Richard, I would never accuse you of such an intent. However asking me to publish in a forum would make it exteremely likely that someone would..

Bit banging is not proprietary technology, having been widely published in a number of places, for the 805x and for other MCU's.
The bit-banging itselef is shown by me in http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=131602 since that definitely not is the prpprietary part; however I can not discuss "why the speed" "why that method".

I just want to know how you get the ten pounds of sh*t into that 5-pound bag as you've claimed. It seems totally unrealistic from a timing standpoint even at the byte-disassembly level. You've got to shovel out, based on the details you've indicated, 10 million bits per second, on the average, and accompany them, in some way, with a clock that won't generate metastabile reception or bit-slips.
once more http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=131602

Perhaps, given that you're unwilling to discuss the byte-disassembly/bit transmission procedure, you should not make such statements that you can't support with facts. As for your claims about your bit-banged data rate? Well, I have my doubts, and I'll bet I'm not alone.
You go ahead and doubt; however I suggest thst you (since you have constantly been trying to force me to calculate 'precisely' YOU do that) do a 5 minute example based on http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=131602 without adding a 8255 to the circuit
are there proprietary 'tricks' that makes the 'narrowness' of the method shown less, of course, but the first working design had none of those.

Erik