| ??? 02/09/07 19:34 Read: times |
#132407 - Wrong question? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I would suspect that the limiting factor would be not so much the UART itself, but the rest of the code being able to process the data sufficiently quickly...? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Maximum Reliable UART Baud Rates for 805x | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The UART in any chip with a T2 can run at F | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks guys. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| syntax error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Point taken | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| welcome to the club | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some club ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| they just were too square :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mmmh, yeah, well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Polling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not only this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scheme | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| isn't it the same? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| polling all the way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| define maximum rate... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| semantics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| for the standard '51/'52... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| non-standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why comes in UART on PC and 232 buffer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK I take back | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CP210x USB-UART | 01/01/70 00:00 |