Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/12/07 22:12
Read: times


 
#132673 - My two cents
Responding to: ???'s previous message
This doesn't sound very useful in my book, since the count of instruction cycles for a given bit of code relates directly to execution time only for code that has no loops or branches. In the more interesting (and typical?) case where the code does contain loops and branches, you need either a simulator or a lot of patience to predict how long it will take to run. I'd say it's much easier and much less error-prone to just add a couple of blips on an unused output pin, load the code onto a physical target, and measure the timing directly with an oscilloscope.

-- Russ


List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Disassembler feature poll            01/01/70 00:00      
   My two cents            01/01/70 00:00      
      My one cent            01/01/70 00:00      
         Code writer?            01/01/70 00:00      
   my opinion            01/01/70 00:00      
      An opposing opinion            01/01/70 00:00      
         "my customers' " and no source ????            01/01/70 00:00      
            C-Source            01/01/70 00:00      
      Two more cents            01/01/70 00:00      
         then, most likely you have stolen it            01/01/70 00:00      
            I strongly disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
            How about Windows, Erik?            01/01/70 00:00      
               waddayamean            01/01/70 00:00      
            see below ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            It can be useful            01/01/70 00:00      
   Purpose            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt.            01/01/70 00:00      
      no banning            01/01/70 00:00      
   go for it            01/01/70 00:00      
      Cool!            01/01/70 00:00      
         TU Clausthal Germany            01/01/70 00:00      
   this feature was independently requested here :)            01/01/70 00:00      
      I second that            01/01/70 00:00      
      New options            01/01/70 00:00      
         thanks for adding these options!) \"==\"            01/01/70 00:00      
   One purpose.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List