| ??? 02/13/07 06:43 Read: times |
#132719 - go for it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Even if not all coders can make use of it, othes will do - and IMHO additional features will never hurt.
We actually did use D52 at our university in the course on assembly language. It did help to show students what the assembler actually added over handassembling into memory. (A course on basic principles of assembly language, not 10000$ embedded firmware projects!) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassembler feature poll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My two cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My one cent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code writer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An opposing opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "my customers' " and no source ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-Source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two more cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then, most likely you have stolen it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Windows, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waddayamean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see below ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go for it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TU Clausthal Germany | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this feature was independently requested here :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One purpose. | 01/01/70 00:00 |