| ??? 02/17/07 17:46 Read: times |
#133179 - It can be useful Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
then, most likely you have stolen it (i.e. obtained it without the copyright owners permission). I can se none, zero, nada, cases where a legally obtained binary will come with "absolutely no clue what it does". Many of the people using a disassembler may be using SDCC in which case you might have the source and still need to verify what's really going on. :) Actually, just in the last week I had to disassemble the output from the Keil compiler. In that case, the Keil product came with a disassembler so that made it easy--but I had to disassemble it nonetheless. Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassembler feature poll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My two cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My one cent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code writer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An opposing opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "my customers' " and no source ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-Source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two more cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then, most likely you have stolen it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Windows, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waddayamean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see below ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go for it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TU Clausthal Germany | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this feature was independently requested here :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One purpose. | 01/01/70 00:00 |