| ??? 02/13/07 17:12 Read: times |
#132791 - One purpose. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Jeff,
Here's the first thing I think of when asking what I would use this Z-directive for. If I want to optimize a piece of code, but not enough that I would go to the trouble of writing it in assembler, then I could use the Z-directive to test various compilations for minimum machine cycles. I might compare various compilations of the same compliler with different settings, or I might compare different compilers with similar settings. I might even compare different implementations or algorithms with the same compiler and settings. I vote Yea! This would be a handy tool to a developer. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassembler feature poll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My two cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My one cent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code writer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An opposing opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "my customers' " and no source ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-Source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two more cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then, most likely you have stolen it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Windows, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waddayamean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see below ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go for it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TU Clausthal Germany | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this feature was independently requested here :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One purpose. | 01/01/70 00:00 |