| ??? 02/18/07 19:52 Modified: 02/18/07 20:03 Read: times |
#133219 - thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hello Jeff,
thanks a lot for adding these options!) !) SDCC's startup code is not contained within a single file but linked from several files (like: crtclear.asm, crtxclear.asm, ...) so it is not immediately obvious how the complete startup code looks like. Your disassembler comes handy there:) d) you would output "==" instead of equ This one mystifies me. Why would you want it? Are there any assemblers that use "==" instead of "equ"? As to the "==". Usually "=" is used Yes. "==" denotes "a globally defined equ" in this case whereas "=" would denote "a locally defined equ". Given nowaday's prevalence of C this would probably not be chosen any more. Still it is internally consistent with the use of ":" for a local label and "::" for a global label. Probably using "=" will be OK as well (because no global "::" label is seen). Thanks again, Frieder (BTW: your entry on the user page is "8052 Open-source Disassembler - by Jeff Post" without mentioning "D52". Maybe add D52 there, so it can be found more easily?) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassembler feature poll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My two cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My one cent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code writer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An opposing opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "my customers' " and no source ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-Source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two more cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then, most likely you have stolen it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Windows, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waddayamean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see below ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go for it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TU Clausthal Germany | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this feature was independently requested here :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One purpose. | 01/01/70 00:00 |