| ??? 02/12/07 22:35 Read: times |
#132679 - Two more cents Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
a disassembler is just about the most worthless tool there is. I have tried it twice and both times found it 10 times more efficient just to code from scratch. It kind of depends on what you are trying to do. If you have a binary image that you need to understand and absolutely no clue what it does, running it through a disassembler is at least a good first step (especially if you get lucky and find that the code was writtten in assembly language in the first place). -- Russ |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Disassembler feature poll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My two cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My one cent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code writer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An opposing opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "my customers' " and no source ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C-Source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two more cents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then, most likely you have stolen it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I strongly disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about Windows, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waddayamean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see below ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can be useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Purpose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd find that useful. It won't ever hurt. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no banning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go for it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cool! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TU Clausthal Germany | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this feature was independently requested here :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for adding these options!) \"==\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One purpose. | 01/01/70 00:00 |