Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/16/07 21:58
Modified:
  03/16/07 22:24

Read: times


 
#135149 - agree
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
I am planning to put the master & slave boards in one enclosure , so they will be usually not more than a foot apart at the farthest end.

no need to use RS-485, you can connect the pins directly.


So the question is academical. Cross-connection of RX-TX may be apropriate.
The only question I have think about always is: if MCU uses pin for a special function (not as a port output one but as special function pin like UART, SPI etc) -- what is the pin`s current for "off" state? By other words, if some slaves have TX pins connected together - do they keep them as weak pull-upped or tie them as strong "1"? In my opinion, special function of some vendors may utilize strong pull-up to keep noise low as possible. So such connection (in theory) may provide short circuit between active slave transmitted "0" and others slaves which try to keep strong "1" due "off" state.
I am sorry - I never tested it for many different vendors so have no answer for all of them.

Regards,
Oleg

List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Master ->Slave communication            01/01/70 00:00      
   That may be your problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   i2c is a bad plan for inter-processor communicatio            01/01/70 00:00      
      I disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
   Broadcast            01/01/70 00:00      
      Some Hardware details            01/01/70 00:00      
         The slave is harder            01/01/70 00:00      
            bitbanging            01/01/70 00:00      
               bit-banging a master-slavbe IIC            01/01/70 00:00      
                  HW I2C            01/01/70 00:00      
                     There are oodles and bunches of other derivatives            01/01/70 00:00      
   RS-485?            01/01/70 00:00      
      as it is local            01/01/70 00:00      
         agree            01/01/70 00:00      
            there are such, but I doubt - that is not somethin            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hence "Broadcast only"            01/01/70 00:00      
               Strong Pullup            01/01/70 00:00      
                  true and untrue            01/01/70 00:00      
   Can we use UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      yes, you have stated \"in the same enclosure\"            01/01/70 00:00      
      Time to review previous replies            01/01/70 00:00      
         Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know it is Atmel, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   No mention of SADDR            01/01/70 00:00      
      no secret, it just isn't there            01/01/70 00:00      
      Here            01/01/70 00:00      
         general info that may not apply to all            01/01/70 00:00      
            Results            01/01/70 00:00      
   How we got it for the records            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List