Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/02/07 19:24
Read: times


 		 #136438 - Results
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Dear Members,
Thank you for the support, today we have been able to successfully communicate master <-> Slave ( 3nos).

It seems to be working well.

My questions now are,
Since I am not changing the voltage levels by using a max232, the master and slave boards will communicate using a bus made by PCB interconnection, what measures should I take to ensure signal integrity is maintained.


With regards
Deepak

List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Master ->Slave communication            01/01/70 00:00      
   That may be your problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   i2c is a bad plan for inter-processor communicatio            01/01/70 00:00      
      I disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
   Broadcast            01/01/70 00:00      
      Some Hardware details            01/01/70 00:00      
         The slave is harder            01/01/70 00:00      
            bitbanging            01/01/70 00:00      
               bit-banging a master-slavbe IIC            01/01/70 00:00      
                  HW I2C            01/01/70 00:00      
                     There are oodles and bunches of other derivatives            01/01/70 00:00      
   RS-485?            01/01/70 00:00      
      as it is local            01/01/70 00:00      
         agree            01/01/70 00:00      
            there are such, but I doubt - that is not somethin            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hence "Broadcast only"            01/01/70 00:00      
               Strong Pullup            01/01/70 00:00      
                  true and untrue            01/01/70 00:00      
   Can we use UART            01/01/70 00:00      
      yes, you have stated \"in the same enclosure\"            01/01/70 00:00      
      Time to review previous replies            01/01/70 00:00      
         Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know it is Atmel, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   No mention of SADDR            01/01/70 00:00      
      no secret, it just isn't there            01/01/70 00:00      
      Here            01/01/70 00:00      
         general info that may not apply to all            01/01/70 00:00      
            Results            01/01/70 00:00      
   How we got it for the records            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List