| ??? 03/24/07 01:42 Read: times |
#135730 - See the edited version of my original reply. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You posted this response while I was editing my first one.
|
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Track lengths and widths (8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Controlled impedance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It wont work out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| See the edited version of my original reply. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an approximation is OK. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hard to really guide but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks for the width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is why Erik goes ballistic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clock signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fast signals don't care about width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Clock signals"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be careful, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1983 Fourth Edition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Length is more important than width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try this, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've tried to explain this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What Mike wants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I meant "Dave and Kai" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I understand... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Join the club! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting note, Kai... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| signal integrity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very cute | 01/01/70 00:00 |