??? 03/25/07 03:33 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#135824 - Length is more important than width Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In the legendary Philips' application note ESG89001 you will find a nice estimation about the maximum length of copper traces as function of chip family.
Because this application note can hardly be found in the web any longer I have stored a copy of this application note on my user space here: http://www.8052.com/users/klaas/ESG89001.PDF I think it will answer most of your questions. Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
Track lengths and widths (8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Controlled impedance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It wont work out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
See the edited version of my original reply. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an approximation is OK. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hard to really guide but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for the width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is why Erik goes ballistic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clock signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fast signals don't care about width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Clock signals"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be careful, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1983 Fourth Edition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Length is more important than width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try this, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've tried to explain this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What Mike wants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I meant "Dave and Kai" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I understand... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Join the club! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting note, Kai... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
signal integrity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very cute![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |