??? 03/25/07 14:02 Read: times |
#135832 - I've tried to explain this. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Mike and Kai,
I tried to explain this stuff, to some extent at least, to Mike in a previous post (http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=135186), one which he never bothered to return to or apparently even read. How can I assume that he never returned to or read his original post and replies? To begin with by his not responding. Moreover, if he had read that post, he'd know better than to show up here asking for "a formula" into which he can plug his clock frequency. I try to help people where I can. And that isn't often since I am not the consummate µcontroller guru that others on this forum are. But when I try to help someone, and all they have to say is, "Yes, yes. But I don't want to know why my question is nonsensical. I just want a formula," I just have to get a little bit crazy! Joe |
Topic | Author | Date |
Track lengths and widths (8051) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Controlled impedance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It wont work out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
See the edited version of my original reply. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an approximation is OK. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hard to really guide but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks for the width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is why Erik goes ballistic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clock signals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fast signals don't care about width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"Clock signals"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be careful, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1983 Fourth Edition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Length is more important than width | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try this, Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I've tried to explain this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What Mike wants | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I meant "Dave and Kai" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I understand... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Join the club! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting note, Kai... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
signal integrity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very cute![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |