Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/24/07 02:23
Read: times


 
Msg Score: +1
 +1 Good Answer/Helpful
#135738 - Clock signals
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Mike,

Just out of curiosity, how do I calculate the minimum track width required based on a given track length and the frequency that goes through it?


See previous replies.

As for your clock, I've never had a need to control the impedance of my clock traces on an 805x board. I will tell you this. Make the traces as short as you can. I'm assuming you're using FR4 material, which means that as long as your traces are less than 6 inches or so you shouldn't really see any high speed effects and you shouldn't need controlled impedance. I can tell you that I use an oscillator, not just a crystal and parasitic caps.

As for trace widths, mine are generally 0.010" wide. You say yours are almost 0.012" wide (0.3mm), so I don't see that you should have any problems. You should understand though, that trace length, while important to high speed digital effects, is irrelevant to trace impedance. Also, I do mine on a 2-layer board as well, and I don't have any high speed problems. For Kai, et al, I will add that I don't worry about EMC. If I were worried about EMC I would definitely be building 4-layer boards with Vcc and GND planes.



List of 25 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Track lengths and widths (8051)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Controlled impedance            01/01/70 00:00      
      It wont work out            01/01/70 00:00      
         See the edited version of my original reply.            01/01/70 00:00      
      an approximation is OK.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Hard to really guide but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            thanks for the width            01/01/70 00:00      
               This is why Erik goes ballistic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Clock signals            01/01/70 00:00      
      thank you            01/01/70 00:00      
         fast signals don't care about width            01/01/70 00:00      
   "Clock signals"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      clock            01/01/70 00:00      
         be careful, Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
            1983 Fourth Edition            01/01/70 00:00      
         Length is more important than width            01/01/70 00:00      
         Try this, Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
            I've tried to explain this.            01/01/70 00:00      
               What Mike wants            01/01/70 00:00      
               I meant "Dave and Kai"            01/01/70 00:00      
               I understand...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Join the club!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Interesting note, Kai...            01/01/70 00:00      
   signal integrity            01/01/70 00:00      
      Very cute            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List