??? 03/29/07 01:10 Read: times |
#136068 - ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'd stop, at this point, worrying about boards, until you have a functional circuit. I have made functional circuits before. As it stands, you, Mike, don't know how to design circuits, Yes I do. I made radios, transistor flipflops, and I had a successful 8051 design with just an EEPROM and the 80C51BH on an 18.432 Mhz clock. You're never going to learn either one until you learn to isolate your faults. and right now, my major issue is getting all the tracks on without the need of many jumpers. I bet anything that me using my wire jumpers that I obtain from cutting resistor and inductor leads in earlier circuits don't conduct electricity well, or have too high of impedance. the less jumpers I have, the easier it is to troubleshoot. You need to learn how to design and construct a circuit that functions properly, that's for sure. That is why I seek advice on each section of my circuit. I am looking for optimal solutions. Remember, I am a hobbyist, not a professional with top-of-the-line equipment. |
Topic | Author | Date |
would buffering help, or hinder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Output = Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
When in doubt, leave it out ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the key! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Expensive jumpers?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Image, Image, Image | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LCR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i think you are confusing Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
General Statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jumpers are not bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
divide and conquer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wire Jumpers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You might want to rethink your position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Advice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More contradictions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Misconceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Optimal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
point confirmed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
troubleshoot WHAT![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |