??? 03/29/07 07:27 Read: times |
#136081 - Optimal? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mike Stegmaier said:
I am looking for optimal solutions. There is no such thing as "optimal". You need to state what your optimum requirements are before anyone can say if any particular solution fits those requirements! You may choose to define "Optimum" to mean "minimum number of jumpers" but, as has been shown, a solution that's "optimum" on that basis will almost certainly be sub-optimum on many others - including things like cost, complexity, reliablility, etc... You may choose to define "Optimum" to mean "makes maximum use of components to hand in my parts bin" but, again, that is almost certain to produce something that would be sub-optimum on many manufacturability criteria! So, it's no use just saying "optimum" - you need to precisely state what constitutes "optimum" for you. |
Topic | Author | Date |
would buffering help, or hinder? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Output = Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
When in doubt, leave it out ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the key! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Expensive jumpers?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Image, Image, Image | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LCR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i think you are confusing Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
General Statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jumpers are not bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
divide and conquer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wire Jumpers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You might want to rethink your position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Advice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More contradictions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Misconceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Optimal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
point confirmed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
troubleshoot WHAT![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |