Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/24/07 15:50
Read: times


 		 #142265 - there are some rad-hard '51's
Responding to: ???'s previous message
browse for UMTC-Aeroflex, IIRC. Also, a hi-temp '51 at Honeywell.

Nevertheless, even if some data of this nature might be available for these parts, I have my doubts that this straightforwardly applies to the $0.20 AT89C51...

JW


List of 25 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Processing capability algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
   At your computer, within a half an hour?            01/01/70 00:00      
      re: Processing capability algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
         what is "fails outright"            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: Processing capability algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
               Idea...            01/01/70 00:00      
               you can't do that            01/01/70 00:00      
               hummm, Oxford...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Look In the Space Program            01/01/70 00:00      
      there are some rad-hard '51's            01/01/70 00:00      
   re: Processing capability algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
      the value of such test...            01/01/70 00:00      
         a bit iof emphasis            01/01/70 00:00      
            rethinking the value...            01/01/70 00:00      
            ESD, 100C operation, and corrosive gas            01/01/70 00:00      
               not operational burn-in and testing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Pushing chip limits            01/01/70 00:00      
                     HUH?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Authority vs Certainty            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the misunderstanding squared            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Misunderstanding cubed and baked            01/01/70 00:00      
                              OK I am not much of a chipmaker...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              also, the 100°C was an arbitrary number...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Proving the negative            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    this is the point.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List