| ??? 09/10/07 15:05 Read: times |
#144312 - why not FRAM Responding to: ???'s previous message |
RAM is faster and does not wear out. ( Plus,I was commenting on the suggestion to use a clock chip for its RAM).
FRAM does not wear out (in yout lifetime) and some of the devices are VERY fast. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Memory of AT89C2051 after reset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is relatively complicated... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why no reset during low power? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| during active reset the oscillator is running... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| power back up? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, certainly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| options? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my way of doing this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then jus a RAM chip would work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wouldn't it be easier and safer with serial EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not FRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Combination of Technologies.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is not matter of "thinking"! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, an another gotcha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here is the best chip for u! | 01/01/70 00:00 |