Have a look at §7.18 in the C standard.

"The typedef name intN_t designates a signed integer type with width N, no padding bits, and a two’s complement representation. Thus, int8_t denotes a signed integer type with a width of exactly 8 bits."


I wrote "Standard C has better ways to [...]" and you extrapolate to "[...] but that their advocates are always self-assured how perfect they are."

From that, we can deduce a strong inconsistency in your statement: "With begin/end, I gained that experience when I learned english as a language [...]".

One day, it might be good to try to read what people do write, instead of what you want/assume them to write. Unfounded extrapolations does not help in a debate.

"you never know" is a subjective (and provable wrong) argument masked as an objective statement.

"they are badly designed" is a subjective argument masked as an objective statement.

"their advocates are alayws [...]" is a subjective (and provable wrong) argument masked as an objective statement.

Spending your time throwing flame baits is the same as disrespecting the original poster.