| ??? 12/12/08 07:54 Read: times |
#160878 - uPSD! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Bill Johnson said:
I use a uPSD3312. Works great. A little wonkiness with the ADC, but easy to work around. Yes. I believe you. But I think that development depends also on systems complexity and also environment where they have to work. Please look at my response to Jan. Bill Johnson said:
Why don't you just do a million (or appropriate number) piece last time buy? Yes. We ordered (less than million ;-) ) PSD pieces for our current projects. But. One project depends on our customer and they chosen another solution. Second thing is that we must find replacement for our new projects. IMHO: A uPSD is solution for simple projects only because of system debugging and emulations. Thank you for your opinion and time. Vaclav |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PSD Memories replacement ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uPSD? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uPSD! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uPSD! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on chip debugging support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| personal experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: personal experience | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on chip debugging support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICE vs. OCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tracing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the specific requirement of OP was... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tracing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ICE vs. OCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uPSD? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if You want Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are Zylogic still in business? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Are Zylogic still in business? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Zylogic | 01/01/70 00:00 |