| ??? 07/09/03 15:12 Read: times |
#50344 - RE: 8051 Dead? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
it's meaningless to compare 8051 to AVR/PIC or whatever
I see no 'comparison' in the posts above. The discussion is about the base for the claim from Microchip ("we make the most"). Most here agree that the right chip for a given application is not necessarily a '51. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pic, Pac, Poe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Pic, Pac, Poe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Pic, Pac, Poe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Pic, Pac, Poe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Pic, Pac, Poe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In whos opinion? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PIC your path! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: PIC your path! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AVR better than PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 Dead? | 01/01/70 00:00 |