| ??? 11/01/03 11:52 Read: times |
#57658 - RE: 100 to 3600 RPM Responding to: ???'s previous message |
@Manfred
"This solutions are exact and better than I work with IRQ." Only with your accentuation on the word "I" ! But I (me) can absolutely not agree, that additional hardware was able to get better results as the AT89C2051 alone. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Babar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - two notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's a dirty job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: it's a dirty job - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: it's a dirty job - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 |