| ??? 11/02/03 18:43 Read: times |
#57694 - RE: 100 to 3600 RPM Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Peter Dannegger wrote:
------------------------------- @Manfred "This solutions are exact and better than I work with IRQ." Only with your accentuation on the word "I" ! But I (me) can absolutely not agree, that additional hardware was able to get better results as the AT89C2051 alone. Peter Hi Peter, to agree is not nessessary: I built and see it, but if you are able to think with logic you will see, that my solution has better results: every time exact the the same. Manfred |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Babar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM - two notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's a dirty job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: it's a dirty job - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: it's a dirty job - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 100 to 3600 RPM | 01/01/70 00:00 |