Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/13/03 15:16
Read: times


 
#58550 - RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine
Responding to: ???'s previous message
DO not discount the Cygnal out of hand. You should also consider that you can get incredible performance (1 clock per cycle) at 25 or even 50 MHz, both JTAG ISP (in system programming) and IAP (in application programming), available parts up to 128 K FLASH, onboard XRAM to 8K bytes, 12 bit & 8 bit analog A/D and D/A, up to 8 ports of I/O .................. and best of all...the hardware debug support that includes breakpoints, watch points, and single stepping of target program while operating at full clock speed out of the FLASH.

There is of course on-board I2C support which works very nice once you see how it works.

Michael Karas

PS...look at C8051F020 or C8051F124 parts for 64 I/Os.



List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware eng            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
   So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List