Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/14/03 14:12
Read: times


 
#58655 - RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
most people that I have talked to that have actually tried debugging and testing with a Cygnal part come back and say they are so glad I told them about it!!
The Cygnal debug is great for the price ($99-$149) but they still have a long way to go to be as handy as an ICE from e.g. Ceibo.

I do totally agree that were I an amateur, the Cygnal kit would be the way to go - the price performance is excellent, but the "pseudo ICE' (nothing derogatory ment by 'pseudo') bums out way too often. For example, when debugging two ends, one with Cygnal and one with CEIBO, I tend to press f7 because that is the CEIBO step key and if you do that with the Cygnal - CRASH and you have to reload. Also the the window handling stinks.

Again the Cygnal kit is worth its price many times over, but still has a way to go to be a professional product.

Erik

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware eng            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
   So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List