Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/13/03 15:26
Read: times


 		 #58552 - RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine
Responding to: ???'s previous message
the Cygnal out of hand. You should also consider that you can get incredible performance (1 clock per cycle) at 25 or even 50 MHz,
But Michael, the '122 can run at 100MHz.

Erik

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware eng            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
   So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List