Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/19/03 00:18
Read: times


 		 #58981 - RE: Work in Progress
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I do consider the Cygnal product a work in progress and as such have no beef with it, just have a problem when it is touted as "professional quality".


Just wondering - how recent is your experience with Cygnal?

I remember when I started with the Triscend the uVision debugging was pretty flaky.

"Some of the tings you see reflect that the people that makes it are not experienced '51 users"

Like the uVision 'Registers' window with the Triscend only ever used to show Bank 0 - irrespective of which Bank was actually selected!

It's definitely much more mature now - can the same be said of Cygnal?

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware eng            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 8051 with inbuilt I2C hardware engine            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: P89C668 ISP /WIN ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
   So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: So whats wrong with Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Poor example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: Work in Progress            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Triscend & Cygnal?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List