??? 04/02/04 21:41 Read: times |
#67828 - RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I forgot to mention,one of our customers went with a solution using a symetric cipher because it was easy to implement and then found that because it was based on a variant of DES it was suseptable to a variety of attacks,so the answer is to concider how much you want to protect your code and from there you can seee which is a good solution. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simpler method is better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Simpler method is better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Simpler method is better![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2 | 01/01/70 00:00 |