Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/04/04 20:22
Read: times


 
#67912 - RE: Simpler method is better
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Bert,

One possible scheme, which I use in one of my own products, is to use a simple cyclic XNOR encryption with an n-byte key. This is basically the same method used to protect the contents of the internal memory in the original 8051 and can be easily decoded by your custom bootloader.
Although Jez will probably object and say that his hamster could crack this in a few hours ;o), it does provide the proper kind of 'barrier' to your client(s).


Rob.

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List