Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/03/04 00:00
Read: times


 
#67832 - RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Anyone with enough knowledge to decode encryption will probably be capable of just rewriting the code. I am assuming that your code is not extremely complex
It is a known fact that creating code from a disassembly is tougher than writing it from scratch if the code is more than a few k. In my opinion, the only reason to really worry about protecting a hex file is when the risk is someone copying the hardware and uses the software 'as is'.

Erik

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List