Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/05/04 13:55
Read: times


 
#67951 - RE: Simpler method is better
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I do not want the customer to be able to read the old code
The protect bits, at least, take care of that one.

One issue about security

there really are two kinds of security needs
a) protect against the thief that want to make a free copy.
b) protect against the sophisticated competitor.

and there is two kinds of need for security
a) protect against theft of the function
b) protects aginst the break of security features such a the password required to loot $1.000.000

if your situation is a) a) I would not worry too much; however if it is b) b) I know of no absolutely bulletproof means.

The thing that most often get lost is the relation between the cost of implementing security measures and the need for sophistication thereof.

The one security I know that works is make the hardware such that it can not be copied and let that be it.


Erik

A QUESTION: This will greatly affect your options. Do youn want 10.000 customers to do the upgrade or do you want 10 distributors/representatives to do it?


Erik

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      
   Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Simpler method is better            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Code security and reflashing P89C51RB2            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List