| ??? 05/10/04 16:31 Read: times |
#70130 - ...Post No.4 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The following are the reading when the same source was executed through VB on the same computer
through VB in the WindowsXP partition: 83556.42 83556.52 83556.52 83556.62 83556.62 83556.72 83556.72 83556.82 83556.82 83556.92 83556.92 83557.02 83557.02 83557.13 83557.13 83557.22 83557.22 83557.32 83557.32 83557.42 83557.42 83557.52 83557.52 83557.63 83557.63 83557.73 83557.73 83557.82 83557.82 83557.92 83557.92 83558.02 83558.02 83558.13 83558.13 83558.23 83558.23 83558.32 83558.32 83558.42 83558.42 83558.52 83558.52 83558.63 83558.63 83558.73 83558.73 83558.82 83558.82 83558.92 83558.92 83559.02 83559.02 83559.13 83559.13 83559.23 83559.23 83559.33 83559.33 83559.42 83559.42 83559.52 83559.52 83559.63 83559.63 83559.73 83559.73 83559.83 83559.83 83559.93 83559.93 83560.02 83560.02 83560.13 83560.13 83560.23 83560.23 83560.33 83560.33 83560.43 83560.43 83560.52 83560.52 83560.63 83560.63 83560.73 83560.73 83560.83 83560.83 83560.93 83560.93 83561.02 83561.02 83561.13 83561.13 83561.23 83561.23 83561.33 83561.33 83561.43 83561.43 83561.53 83561.53 83561.63 83561.63 83561.73 83561.73 83561.83 83561.83 83561.93 83561.93 83562.03 83562.03 83562.13 83562.13 83562.23 83562.23 83562.33 83562.33 83562.43 83562.43 83562.53 83562.53 83562.63 83562.63 83562.73 83562.73 83562.83 83562.83 83562.93 83562.93 83563.03 83563.03 83563.13 83563.13 83563.23 83563.23 83563.33 83563.33 83563.43 83563.43 83563.53 83563.53 83563.63 83563.63 83563.73 83563.73 83563.83 83563.83 83563.93 83563.93 83564.03 83564.03 83564.13 83564.13 83564.23 83564.23 83564.33 83564.33 83564.43 83564.43 83564.53 83564.53 83564.63 83564.63 83564.73 83564.73 83564.84 83564.84 83564.93 83564.93 83565.03 83565.03 83565.13 83565.13 83565.23 83565.23 83565.34 83565.34 83565.44 83565.44 83565.53 83565.53 83565.63 83565.63 83565.73 83565.73 83565.84 83565.84 83565.94 83565.94 83566.03 83566.03 83566.13 83566.13 83566.23 83566.23 83566.34 83566.34 83566.44 83566.44 Do the same with the above result of the code executed in WindowsXP partition, and see the result. If you have difficulty in getting the results from the above reading, then I will post the Excel file. I do not know how to post the Excel file in this forum. I have tested the same code on various PC in my office and my friends PCs, and found the similar result. That Sleep (100) sometimes gives less delay in Windows98, but works perfectly well in WindowsXP. Now my questions: 1. Looking at the above results, I concluded that this is a bug in Windows (Microsoft). So prove it to me that the above results are wrong. Or atleast point me the mistake that I have done when doing this test. I will be very thankful to you. 2. The point that Windows is not a RTOS, is known to me also. But since this command is used most frequently (?) by any of the windows based RS232 communication programs, I thought maybe I should explain the problem that I had faced, to other people so that they do not waste their time in doing the same debugging which I have done. Please forgive me if I have hurt the feelings of any person, I do not intend to hurt anybody. If anybody wants the anymore details about the above test, they can request me by email, I will mail the whole project folder, including some more results performed on other PCs. My e-mail ID: mr_kiran@yahoo.com. I am still thinking possitively on the above issue. Please reply me if I have done some mistake, so that I will be able to take care in future projects. Many thanks, With best regards from, Mr. Kiran V. Sutar. P.S. I am not an expert in VB; if any VB guru might want to throw some more light on this issue, then please do so...I will be very thankful to you. |
