| ??? 06/29/04 20:13 Read: times |
#73399 - RE: Real Time Clock. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There are lots of routines for I2C all over the internet
Arif Deshmukh might use keil and the routines for I2C, and it would be a piece of cake I haven't used SPI so i can't say if it is easier than I2C You can use almost any RTC and it will work fine. But you should consider your requirement, perhaps he wants to have a resolution of 1/100 sec |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dead Thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| higher accuracy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: higher accuracy? Of course ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Vengance? Of course no ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Higher accuracy without calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 |