??? 06/30/04 10:37 Read: times |
#73436 - Higher accuracy without calibration Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you hate calibration you can also use more expensive reference crystals e.g. 10.000,000MHz or even better temperature compensated reference crystal oscillators.
So you can decide: calibration versus cost Peter |
Topic | Author | Date |
Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dead Thread | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
higher accuracy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: higher accuracy? Of course ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Vengance? Of course no ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Vengance? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Higher accuracy without calibration![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Real Time Clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 |