| ??? 07/11/04 18:39 Read: times |
#73987 - RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So your suggestion would be to go with the triac+thyristor design after all? For me it would look reasonable, if not that mysterious note...
So, what is wrong/illegal with it and what should be done to make it legal/safe? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8mm isolation path length is needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the required aim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What is the required aim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Right vs The Legal. | 01/01/70 00:00 |